-CC- Released in a creative commons, where unexpected uses may occur.
-BY- Attribution requested wherever you can see my work in your own.
-NC- Without my signature, copies printed must be gifts.
-ND- Major degrees of corruption are compulsory for use.
     You may not use insignificant changes, such as recolouring, to call them your own.
     I reserve the right to do that much for a customer who has coloured walls or a frame
     to match.

That is about as close as a man will get to hot pink. I offer to match decor; no takers from the web so far. julfn+zsqrd is a fractint internal formula, and it lets me select the function and two numbers, so it is my work, especially if I also fill out a palette. I should find code for a colour selector. The alternative to matching decor is complementing it.

Source. I used two renderings, one an outside=atan grayscale, the other in two colours for the outer and inner set, and an off-center PaintShopPro gradient for that one.

Textures are distinctive in my work. I get them from guessing where I should flip the sign of an imajinary component or exchange an imajinary component with a real component. It is a very speculative art. Textures only threaten to make an inner set sparse. My borders are typically in a set, because these are mostly inversions, where my starting points are (1,0)/(x,y) or a point nearby.

That has very simple colour scheme; one rainboh, one grayscale; two views of the same loop.

A fiktoid is obvious fiction; a joke intended to be read with disbelief, which demands this 8-; (tung in cheek with sunglasses) emoticon.

The most likely prophecy is what you will perform, so the majority of prophecy is self-fulfilling.

Cats can suffer from many illnesses. Insomnia is not one of them. I am lost at how to colour that. If you want blue, though, then for print, I will make it range from black, through blue, and to white.

This payj contains mostly escape-time loop fractals, meaning that points begin on the cartesian plane or a complex function of it. If they move too far, then I assume that they will keep moving towards infinity. When my loop decides that a pixel is not periodic (out of the set), then it counts how many cycles of the loop (iterations) it took to figure that out. Usually, I make that loop count into two hundred and fifty five hues (256 if you count zero, which is usually assigned to the inner set). I usually make the angle that an escaped point makes with the x-axis into a brightness (outside=atan).

This is a Julia Set from the loop in my Beefak fractal (renamed Vivisection). In Julia sets, instead of adding a pixel's starting point, a loop adds an arbitrary constant. A correlation is between that constant and the the point it reprezents in a Mandelbrot type. In FracTint, which haz an excellent palette editor, you can often toggle between Julia sets and their cousins with a press of your space bar.

Source. I blew numbers from this tune into the above fractal. I am not kidding, either.

Imajinary numbers are always multiplied by the square root of negative one. Complex numbers in fractint terms are composed of (x,y), where y is imajinary. To a computer, all numbers are real, so maybe fractals are a way of giving an imajination to computers, because I know all of the lies I get from my computer are imajinary.

Build a better mouse and Micro$oft will beat a path to your door. Mousing has little to do with fractals. All I do is write a loop and fill out a palette, which might involve raynjez of colour. Fractals are loopy graphics. I rarely use a saturation component, prefering rainbow colours to pastels and dark tones.

I plan to make playing cards with that last of four fractals. Three of my suit fractals contain embedded tunes, and that process had a clear effect on Diamonds and Hearts. If you look carefully, you will notice that those are the only fractals I made, before 2009, that display an inverse symmetry in brightness: Where it is dark on one side, it is light on the other, like embossing confused.

Source and commentary.

"'Optimized dots per inch" means [adjusted for comparison with four colours per pixel], so that if a typical ink jet prints at six hundred real dots per inch, then it also prints more colours per pixel (less colours than a screen, and more than most lasers). In practical words, six hundred dpi, square, times eight inches by ten, means that transparencies in ink jet printers are good for reprezenting nearly twenty-nine megapixels. Transparencies carry a lot of detail beyond perception, unless you blow them up to a few feet square.

I thot I had lost that one, because it was based upon an equation that is hard-coded into fractint and I did not name it. All I had to do was find a graphic, because fractint saves parameters into GIFs. One beauty of fractals is that it is hard to argue that your selection of colouring and post-processing are not in themselves distinct. Making functions into parameters compounds the level of individuality you can put into a fractint loop.

That is a cousin of TigerDilly, with a lot more emphasis on texture.

That is not an orijinal name for a fractal at all. Another popular name is flowsnake.

The neck is too short, and I know not what to do about it. I would not try to construct it in three dimensions. Then again, maybe it makes some kind of weird acoustic sense. It is very hard to see what it might sound like as thin-metal welding.

Bowser, Labster, Tippy, and Atlantis all come from the same formula with different functions in the parameters. My formula, waffle, fails to specify three functions.

That is a synonym for Utopia if nowhere is loud.

Some people like grayscales. They match everything and they draw attention to some place in the room without demanding comment. When worn, they do not contrast with stains. They never look edible to children or animals. They are also more persistent than colours.

A vektor specifies a time and destination if you know the orijin; You can calculate a vektor from two points, or it can explicitly be an angle and a rate. Either way of representing a vektor can be convenient, and of course they are inter-convertible. Whitecourt is over two hours driving, north-west of Edmonton, at the speed limit, which is mostly a hundred clicks. I could also give you a GPS figure that would let you measure that distance.

"Benwaw" is an anglicization of "Benoit", where someone applies what few rules of spelling are in Ingglish. English does not borrow words from other languages: it takes those languages down a blind alley and goes through their pockets for loose rules of spelling.

Computers are like these animals. When they do not what you want, it is because you did not spend enough time understanding them. Do you really want surprises from your computer? Try wrapping your mind around this stuff.

"Nothing new is under the sun. What will be done has been done. What has been done will be done.", says The Preacher in Ecclesiastes. It is all new to me.

One thing about Windows Media Video that impresses me is that it gets about five times the compression ratio of MPEG, and I strongly suspect that Michael Barnsley's work in reversing arbitrary images to Hyperbolic Iterated Function Systems -- turning any graphic into a fractal representation, or fractal compression, is still in wmv. It was used in Encarta.

I made that with Fractal Designer, which makes data that fractint reads. The colours in it number like the number of triangles in it, so it compresses much better as a four bit GIF, than as a JPEG. Each triangle affects how all of the other ones are displayed, and the direction of the triangle is relevant.

I am back into piping tunes into fractals with that one. It is the first asymmetrical one I did with a tune, so do not be surprized that the tune does not reverse enjineer -- not in an obvious way. It is a lot brighter in a rendition for printing, which graduates to white. In case you did not notice, I use stop-light colours with a blue and black background, and my text is white, so I cannot use bright colours in the background. My web pages print fine as negatives if you do not want to print a lot of black.

Your mouse will show my names for them. You are welcome to describe or call them, however and whatever you like, as long as you tell (or at the very least are prepared to tell) where you got them (That is what -BY- means in a creative commons). They are essentially copyrighted in a CC-BY-NC-ND fashion, which means that they are freely available as is. However, without drastic changes of my source to make them your own, and I am not sure that changing my colours should count, because I offer to do that. Without drastic changes, I do not believe you are entitled to derivatives. You should also know that it is convenient for me to jenerate them at one hundred and twenty eight megapixels (and the ones without grayscaling are practical at a gigapixel), and I do not believe you are entitled to print more than one megapixel without my permission.

My deal is simple. You tell me where you want to print, and on what. It can be as big as the wallpaper that outdoor sign companies use. It can be as small as a coffee mug. All I get is twenty percent on top of the retail price; ten percent if you are providing retail shelf space to sell it (in most cases, that means more than one copy). You find a printer in your locale who can do the job, or I do, and I e-mail them, OR I snail a disk to a printer local to you with confirmation by phone; should arrive in less than a week. Contact information is on top of my home page. Even though I publish my e-mail address where any spammer can see it, I hav no right to distribute yours.